We continue to develop our market-leading experience and know-how in this rapidly evolving area, in order to remain ahead of the curve
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Explore our global foreign investment blog, where you will find insights, commentary and news from our dedicated foreign investment lawyers around the globe.
Throughout this global foreign investment podcast series, lawyers from across our offices will be joined by speakers from global regulators to bring a different viewpoint on the practical issues, interesting quirks and thoughts on how to navigate deals throughout their respective regimes.
In this series, we feature a number of resources, including a high-level summary of the key provisions of the Act, together with podcasts and blog posts dealing with specific aspects of this new regime.
We have issued a series of notes introducing the new regulations as they are released, including a high-level summary of key provisions and additional notes, available below, providing details on some of the changes to CFIUS’s jurisdiction and processes.
Welcome to our Competition blog, where you will find insights, updates and news from our Competition / Antitrust team across the globe.
Linklaters' Trade Law lawyers work with our clients to navigate complex trade law risks and maximise the opportunities for cross-border trade.
Companies increasingly view State aid law as a powerful tool to challenge the legality of fiscal regimes and other State measures which favour their competitors. Our clients gain a competitive advantage from our wealth of experience in handling complex State aid cases.
Foreign Investment Control Thresholds by Jurisdiction
Under Australia’s foreign investment regime, acquisitions by a “foreign person” are subject to governmental control for reasons of “national interest” or “national security” if they fall into one of four categories:
(i) mandatory filing for transactions where certain valuation thresholds are met (notifiable actions);
(ii) voluntary filing where a transaction does not meet the valuation thresholds but raises “national interest” concerns (significant actions);
(iii) mandatory filing where a transaction involves the acquisition, or the starting of a ‘national security business’ (see below) or acquisitions of Australian land used for defence or national intelligence purposes (notifiable national security actions);
(iv) the Government also has a right to “call in” transactions that raise national security concerns (reviewable national security actions).
A pre-completion foreign investment filing with the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) is mandatory for notifiable actions and notifiable national security actions.
Filing thresholds are separated according to whether a transaction involves the acquisition of Australian shares/businesses on the one hand or an interest in Australian land on the other. In general, the thresholds vary by acquirer type – principally whether an acquirer is from a country that has a free trade agreement with Australia or not (higher valuation thresholds for free trade countries) – and for sensitive sectors. Foreign government investors (including State-Owned Enterprises) also have separate thresholds.
Notifiable national security actions
All acquisitions of direct interests (10%+) in a national security business, starting a national security business or acquiring an interest in national security land, are notifiable. The focus is on the activities of the Australian business being acquired or established and not its value. This also captures acquisitions of interests in regulated ‘critical infrastructure’ (e.g. electricity, gas, water, ports) and regulated telecommunications businesses.
Significant actions and reviewable national security actions
For significant actions, parties must self-assess whether a transaction raises “national interest” concerns and FIRB approval should therefore be sought voluntarily. National interest is not defined, however typically includes considerations regarding national security (also undefined), competition, other Australian government policies (e.g. tax), the impact on the economy and the character of the investor.
Since 1 January 2021, the Treasurer has a “call in power” to review transactions which are not notified to FIRB where they pose a national security concern. The risk of being called in can be removed by voluntarily applying for FIRB approval.
A 20% interest is typically deemed to grant control for foreign investment purposes. However, lower thresholds apply for foreign government investors, certain sensitive sectors and for the acquisition of national security businesses (see above).
Key sensitive sectors currently include: media, telecommunications, defence, military-related industries, nuclear-related activities, critical infrastructure and data and personal information. Other sectors of particular interest to FIRB from a national security perspective, include banking and finance, commercial construction, critical minerals, critical technologies, energy, food and grocery, health, IT and cloud services, space and transport. Acquisitions of land (particularly agricultural, residential and mining tenements) are also considered sensitive.
For more information, see our publications below
A Belgian foreign investment (FI) screening regime is expected to enter into force on 1 July 2023.
The Belgian FI screening regime will apply to investments by non-EU investors looking to acquire voting rights in Belgian-based entities or targets with Belgian subsidiaries that are active in certain sensitive sectors (such as critical infrastructure, defence, artificial intelligence, etc.).
The regime is mandatory and suspensory, meaning investors are obliged to notify to and obtain approval from an Inter-federal Screening Commission (ISC) pre-closing. The ISC also initiate investigations on its own motion. A completed deal can be investigated up to two years after its implementation (extendable to five years in case of bad faith). This may lead to the deal being overturned or exposed to remedies.
Furthermore, investors (undertakings but also natural persons) may face fines of between 10-30% of the value of the investment if they fail to notify a reportable investment or if they provide incorrect or misleading information.
The Belgian regime will be broadly based on three different types of notification thresholds:
First, a filing is triggered for acquisitions of 25% or more of the voting rights in Belgian entities whose activities involve:
There is no investment value or turnover threshold for these investments.
Second, investors will need to notify acquisitions of 25% or more of the voting rights in Belgian entities that: (a) are active in the biotech sector, and (b) have realised a turnover of at least EUR 25 million in the financial year preceding the investment.
Third, the regime covers acquisitions of 10% or more of the voting rights in Belgian entities that: (a) are active in the energy, defence (including dual-use products), cybersecurity, or electronic communication sector, and (b) have realised a turnover of at least EUR 100 million in the preceding financial year.
Greenfield investments are in any case excluded from the scope of the screening regime.
The Belgian FI regime will only screen investments by non-EU investors. That means that the regime will apply to natural persons that have their main residence outside the EU, undertakings that are established outside the EU and undertakings where the main residence of the ultimate beneficial owner is outside the EU.
The regime applies to direct or indirect acquisitions of voting rights in entities incorporated in Belgium that are active in one of the sensitive sectors. Investments in a non-Belgian target may also require a filing if the target has a subsidiary in Belgium.
For more information, see our publications below
Canada has an extensive and long-standing foreign investment regime. Given enforcement to date, national security should be top of mind for foreign investors. In April 2020 in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, Canada announced enhanced scrutiny for foreign investments in public health, the supply of critical goods and services, or those undertaken by state-owned enterprise investors. On 24 March 2021, the government issued updated national security guidelines which formalised the broad approach to the industries and issues that may garner national security interest that had been in place during the pandemic and added detail on the key sensitive sectors for national security review purposes.
On 2 August 2022, Canada introduced a voluntary foreign investment filing regime for investments which fall outside the mandatory regime. Such investments can be reviewed under the Investment Canada Act’s national security regime and the voluntary regime aims to provide an avenue for investors to have comfort by doing any review prior to implementation.
The Investment Canada Act (ICA) applies to non-Canadians investing in or establishing a Canadian business. There are two types of investments that are reviewed under the ICA: review of significant investments and review of investments that could be injurious to Canada’s national security.
An acquisition of control will be “notifiable” or “reviewable” depending on the transaction structure, non-Canadian’s identity, and target’s value/nature:
If an acquisition of a cultural business does not trigger the thresholds, a review may still be ordered.
In addition, all investments, regardless of size or whether control is acquired, can be reviewed on national security grounds, including the establishment of a new business.
Control rules are complex, but generally: i) acquisition of a majority of the voting or undivided ownership interests of an entity constitutes control; ii) the acquisition of substantially all or all of an entity’s Canadian assets constitutes control; and iii) there is a rebuttable presumption that the acquisition of at least 33.3% of voting shares of a corporation constitutes control.
The mandatory filing requirements generally apply to (i) direct and indirect acquisitions of control of a Canadian business, (including minority share acquisitions of 33.3%, unless no control was acquired); and (ii) the establishment of a new Canadian business. The ICA rules apply to foreign investments in any sector.
The voluntary filing regime is available for investments by non-Canadians in a Canadian Busines not involving the acquisition of control or otherwise not subject to mandatory notification or review.
Investments by state-owned enterprises; further, sensitive sectors include: military/defence; Canadian cultural heritage; public health; technology; sensitive personal data; critical minerals; critical mineral supply chains and critical infrastructure/goods/services, among others.
Foreign investors should consider whether any of the below five foreign investment regimes in the PRC apply to their transactions. The key criterion is always whether a foreign investor is proposing to acquire a Chinese company / asset or is otherwise involved in an investment in the PRC. Several changes to the regimes came into effect on 1 January 2020 and 18 January 2021 (for NSR review). To date, no specific Covid-19 restrictions have been included in the legislation or regulations governing foreign investment in the PRC.
National Security Review (NSR) - applies where:
Pre-closing approval by the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) - for the acquisition of a Chinese entity where the “foreign” investor (i) is established or ultimately controlled by a Chinese domestic entity or Chinese individual and such domestic entity or individual is also affiliated with the target; (ii) is using offshore shares as the consideration for the acquisition; or (iii) acquires control of a famous brand or household name or control of an entity in a key industry.
Depending on the specific rules, “control” in the above contexts can include a shareholding of 50% (or a lower ownership percentage with significant influence over the target), or effective control of the target’s business policies, irrespective of shareholding.
Registration with the relevant bureau of the State Administration for Market Regulation ("SAMR") - required if the investment involves a direct change in the shareholding of a FIE or changes to its legal representative, directors, supervisors or manager. SAMR is also responsible for reviewing transactions where the target is active in a sector (“Restricted Sector”) covered by the national or respective FTZ “negative list”. Restricted Sectors limitations on foreign ownership/ management, as well as industry specific regulatory approvals/ filings, may apply.
Pre-closing approval by, or filing with, National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) at the relevant level – required for industrial/ infrastructure projects invested by a foreign investor. Not required if the target is in a financial sector.
MOFCOM information reporting – MOFCOM has introduced new information reporting requirements for all FIEs which came into effect from 1 January 2020, replacing the previous filing-based system for establishment of, and changes to, FIEs.
The regimes generally apply to share purchases and some asset purchases. In addition, the NSR can apply more broadly to an investment directly or indirectly conducted by a foreign investor in China in any other form. No further clarity is provided under the Security Review Measures or other relevant laws or regulations for what this catch-all clause may entail. Such other forms may cover contractual control, nominee or trust arrangements, reinvestments, offshore transactions, leasing, subscription of convertible bonds etc.
Certain industry sectors are categorised as prohibited for investment into China (e.g. fishery, publication and broadcasting). Sensitive sectors in the context of NSR review include: under Category A, military or military supporting industry; the vicinity of military facilities or military industrial facilities; other businesses related to national defence / security; under Category B, key technologies; major equipment manufacturing; important agriculture products; important energy and resources; important infrastructure and transportation services; important cultural products or services; important IT and Internet products or services; important financial services; and other important industries relating to national security.
For more information, see our publications below
The European Union does not operate an own foreign investment review but coordinates and encourages the harmonisation of the national foreign investment review rules of its Member States.
To align the national investment reviews, the European Union adopted the FDI Screening Regulation, which became came into effect on 11 October 2020. The FDI Screening Regulation does not establish a fully harmonized foreign investment regime in the EU, nor intends to replace the national foreign investment regimes of the different Member States. Instead, it seeks to promote best practices, cooperation and information sharing regarding foreign investment control between the European Commission and the Member States.
As of 10 May 2022, 18 Member States have active foreign investment regimes, namely Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovak Republic and Spain. To close the regulatory gap, a number of remaining Member States are considering introducing their own foreign investment regimes (e.g. Belgium, Estonia, Ireland and Luxembourg), therefore the list of foreign investment regimes in the EU is expected to increase in the future.
Since there is no separate foreign investment regime exercised by the European Union it does not contain specific acquisition thresholds and investments are not required to be notified to the European Commission. However, the European Commission can issue opinions in case the FDI might have an effect on security or public order in more than one Member State, or if it has relevant information in relation to the FDI. The opinions are non-binding on the Member States.
The FDI Screening Regulation considers as foreign investment any kind by a foreign investor aiming to establish or maintain lasting and direct links to the target, including control over the target company. The FDI Screening Regulation addresses investments by third countries, i.e. non-Member States.
Critical infrastructure (energy, transport, water, health, communications, media, data processing or storage, aerospace, defence, electoral or financial infrastructure and sensitive facilities, as well as land and real estate crucial for the use of such infrastructure), critical technology (artificial intelligence, robotics, semiconductors, cyber security, aerospace, defence, dual use goods/services, energy storage, quantum technologies, nuclear technologies, nanotechnologies, biotechnologies), critical input suppliers (e.g. raw materials), food security, companies using and storing personal data, and media companies.
For more information, see our publications below
The French foreign investment regime is a long-standing and well-established mandatory regime. Where a transaction falls within the scope of the French foreign investment rules, a filing must be made to the Minister for the Economy to request an authorisation. The French foreign investment regime is suspensory, which means that the parties cannot close until they have obtained clearance from the Minister for the Economy. The Minister has the authority to authorise the transaction with or without conditions. The Minister also has the authority to block transactions by means of a reasoned decision.
There are no turnover thresholds under the French foreign investment regime, and a filing may be required even where the turnover of the French target is very low. The requirement for prior approval is also not dependent on the importance of the activity at issue, compared to the overall activities of the target. For instance, a single government contract may be sufficient to trigger a filing obligation and a case-by-case assessment is required in each case.
A filing to the Minister for the Economy will be triggered if a “foreign investor” (including French nationals residing outside France) acquires control, exceeds 25% of voting rights (save for investors from the European Union) or acquires all or part of the assets of a French law entity operating in certain sectors.
Since 6 August 2020, an additional threshold at which the foreign investment screening regime is triggered has been implemented, at 10% of voting rights for non-EU investors acquiring shares in listed companies.
Sensitive sectors include: defence, energy, water, transport, space, electronic communications, police, health, agricultural products that contribute to national food safety objectives, print and online press services for political and general information, quantum technologies, energy storage and technologies involved in the production of renewable energy.
The list of sectors falling within the scope of the French foreign investment regime can be extended by decree (i.e., almost overnight) when needed (e.g. the Alstom/General Electric merger).
With effect from 1 April 2020, the list of sensitive sectors is now the same for all foreign investors, regardless of whether they are located within or outside the European Union.
For more information, see our publication below
The German regime is a long-standing regime which underwent major changes in the past four years, including a significant extension of its scope of application sanctions. Depending on the type of sector affected, it may kick when acquiring 10% or more of voting rights and requires a mandatory filing for a wide range of transactions. Whether German foreign investment review is applicable depends on (i) the origin of the investor, (ii) the sensitivity of the targets activities in Germany and (iii) the share of voting rights acquired.
Most recently, we have seen a number of very significant reforms. The main changes are (i) 16 new sectors were added to the sectors in scope of a mandatory and suspensory filing requirement, (ii) the concept of atypical control was included to capture transactions below the relevant thresholds if the investors has certain additional rights, (iii) additional thresholds for follow-on acquisitions by the same investor were included, and (iv) the introduction of severe sanctions including imprisonment of up to five years in case of intent or fines in case of negligence of up to EUR 500,000.
The German foreign investment regime distinguishes between acquisitions triggering a mandatory filing requirement and those which only fall under a voluntary filing regime:
For transactions falling in the mandatory category, a filing is required in case that a non- EU/EFTA investor acquires (indirectly/directly) voting rights in the German target exceeding specific thresholds. The threshold depends on the exact target activity and is either 10% or 20%. In case of certain highly sensitive target business activities, this regime applies to all non-German investors.
The voluntary filing regime applies for (indirect/direct acquisition of 25% of voting rights in the German target by non-EU/non-EFTA investors.
Asset deals and internal restructuring are in scope of the foreign investment rules in Germany with only limited safe harbours.
Depending on the sector, follow-on acquisitions by the same investor may trigger a new foreign investment review when the total voting shares by an investor exceed 20%, 25%, 40%, 50% or 75%.
Sensitive sectors include: Defence, healthcare, medical devices and diagnostic equipment, biotechnology, defence, robotics, semiconductors, cybersecurity, aerospace, quantum technologies, nuclear technologies, artificial intelligence, nano technologies, supply of critical inputs (energy or raw materials as well as for food safety), access to sensitive information (including personal data), media, telematics, dual use services/goods, cloud computing, additive manufacturing, automated and autonomous driving, critical infrastructures such as energy, water, IT and telecommunication, finance and insurance, transport and food. Further, investments in certain companies of the “German Mittelstand”, in particular the so called “hidden champions” may attract higher scrutiny.
For more information, see our publications below
The Golden Powers Regulation (GPR) is the main set of rules on foreign investments in Italy. The GPR originally only provided for a mandatory filing in a limited number of sectors, i.e. defence, national security, energy, transport and communications. However, over the years, the scope of application has been substantially extended to additional sectors, including 5G technologies and the sectors outlined in the EU Screening Regulation.
In April 2020, the Italian Government strengthened its foreign investment rules, the so-called ’golden power’ rules. The reform further extended the scope to the other sensitive sectors outlined in the EU Screening Regulation as well as to the financial, credit and insurance sectors.
New notification requirements, introduced due to Covid-19 and in force at least until 31 December 2022, now cover:
Lower thresholds apply for acquisitions of shareholdings in a Strategic Company active in the defence or national security sectors, with the minimum threshold being 3% of their corporate capital or voting rights.
Transactions covered include share or asset deals, as well as resolutions, acts or transactions having, directly or indirectly, an impact on the relevant assets and relationships of a Strategic Company.
Intra-group transactions are not exempted. In addition, a notification obligation can also be triggered by resolutions/acts/transactions not linked to an M&A deal, including resolutions of a Strategic Company concerning, among other things, its relocation outside Italy or its dissolution, or amendments to its corporate object or to certain clauses of its Articles of Association and, in certain circumstances, the incorporation of a company that will carry out strategic activities.
Sensitive sectors include defence, national security, energy, transport, communications, finance, credit, insurance, steel, agri-food sectors and 5G technologies, personal data, media, aerospace, water, health, data processing or storage, electoral or financial infrastructure and sensitive facilities, as well as land and real estate crucial for the use of such infrastructure, dual use items and technologies, artificial intelligence, robotics, semiconductors, cybersecurity, energy storage, quantum and nuclear technologies as well as nanotechnologies and biotechnologies.
For more information, see our publication below
The Japanese foreign investment scheme is a mandatory regime. Foreign investors are required either (i) to obtain a pre-closing approval or (ii) file a post-closing notification depending on the identity of the acquirer and the nature of the Japanese business subject to the investment. If pre-closing approval is required, closing is not permitted before the local clearance and the statutory review period is 30 calendar days.
In light of the impact of Covid-19, the Japanese government intends to add healthcare as a sensitive sector.
Pre-closing approval is required for any direct investment by a foreign investor in a Japanese company:
Post-closing notification is required for any direct investment by a foreign investment in a Japanese company that is active solely in non-sensitive sectors resulting in a holding of 10% or more of the shares or voting rights.
The acquisition of a foreign entity that already holds a Japanese company does not trigger a filing.
Foreign investment into Japan includes but not limited to:
Also, internal re-organisations may be captured if the direct parent company changes and the new parent company is a foreign investor.
Key sensitive sectors are:
The Russian foreign investment regime traditionally only applies if the transaction results in an acquisition (direct/indirect) of any shares or rights in respect of a Russian entity or its assets (noting that payments and acquisition of securities of foreign entities may be subject to separate foreign investment restrictions not covered herein).
To date, the most complicated requirements applied to the broad (60+) list of sensitive – strategic – sectors with certain pre-closing approvals potentially taking 6 to 12 months or longer to obtain. However, the foreign investment regime is much broader than just the sensitive strategic sectors, and since February 2022 it has been ramped up to further scrutinise foreign investment in Russia, as well as exits of foreign investments from Russia (commonly referred to as the ‘Russian countersanctions regime’). This results in transactions requiring multiple foreign investment clearances (often from a number of regulators) at the same time, more transactions may be prohibited by law entirely until further notice, and the regulators are no longer statutorily bound in terms of remedies they may impose on the parties.
The thresholds depend on the exact combination of: (i) the type of investor and its beneficiaries / controlling persons (in particular, whether it is or is controlled by a Hostile Nation Person/Entity, a foreign state or international organisation); (ii) the type of Russian entity (in particular, if it is a Strategic Entity or included in any ‘protected lists’); (iii) the transaction structure (asset or share deal, acquisition of control or blocking rights, etc.), as well as (iv) the identity of the seller and its beneficiaries / controlling persons.
The combinations may result in: suspensory pre-closing clearance; pre-closing disclosure of UBOs; post-transaction notification or clearance; or a prohibition to acquire. Clearances may need to be sought from the GC which is essentially the entire Russian Government, a newly formed Sub-Commission of the GC (Sub-GC), the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia or the President of Russia.
Filings may be triggered by the acquisition of just one share (or 1%) in a Russian entity, including indirectly, though traditional foreign investment filings are usually triggered by an acquisition of 5%/25%/50% or more shares (votes) in a Russian entity, or of blocking rights in respect of a Russian entity or certain types of assets owned by such entity.
Whether or not the Russian foreign investment regime is triggered should be checked in every transaction that results in an acquisition (direct/indirect) of any shares or rights in respect of a Russian entity or assets owned by a Russian entity.
Restricted Investors are prohibited from:
Further restrictions, including clearance requirements and prohibitions to acquire, in sensitive industries such as media, insurance, banking, air & space, etc. may apply, but are not covered herein.
Strategic Entity: Russian entity engaged in an activity of “strategic significance” for Russia.
Subsoil Strategic Entity: Russian Strategic Entity which carries out geological studies, exploration and/or extraction of subsoil resources on land plots of federal significance. Following a series of court decisions, an entity which provides oilfield services on land plots of federal significance (even if not directly including geological studies, exploration and/or extraction of resources), is also a Subsoil Strategic Entity.
Strategic Fishing Entity: Russian Strategic Entity which is engaged in extraction (fishing) of aquatic biological resources.
Restricted Investor: foreign states, international organisations, foreign investors which had not disclosed their beneficiaries to the regulator and any entity controlled by them (including by several such investors in aggregate).
Ordinary Investor: entity controlled by non-Russian citizens or companies (or Russian citizens with a foreign citizenship) and not controlled by Restricted Investors (after a completed UBO disclosure).
Hostile Nation Person/Entity: primarily a person which is a foreign citizen or entity which is registered in a ‘hostile nation’ or the primary place of business of which person/entity is in a ‘hostile nation, the latter being a country which has introduced sanctions and/or other restrictive measures against the Russian Federation, Russian individuals and/or entities, and is listed in the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 430-r (the list includes the UK, the EU and most other European countries, the US, Canada, as well as other countries).
Over 60 different industries are regarded of “strategic significance”, as well as traditionally sensitive industries such as media, insurance, banking, air & space, etc. From August 2022 additional prohibitions apply to entities included in certain ‘protected lists’ and/or engaged in the fuel and energy and natural resources sector, the financial sector, as well as entities in which the Russian Federation holds shares.
Since March 2020, Spain has two alternative regimes of foreign investment screening:
If such investments also meet the additional requirements under each regime (see “Transactions covered by the rules” below), they will require prior approval by the Spanish Council of Ministers or, if the transaction value is below EUR 5 million, from a Directorate General of International Trade and Investment.
Under the general regime, transactions covered are investments by non-EU/EFTA investors (above the thresholds and with the conditions mentioned above) that meet either of the two following alternative criteria:
Under the temporary regime, transactions covered are investments by non-Spanish EU/EFTA investors (above the thresholds and with the conditions mentioned above) in one of the sectors that affect “public order, public security and public health” (for example, critical technologies and dual-use items: artificial intelligence, robotics, semi-conductors, cybersecurity, quantum technology, aerospace, defence, energy, nuclear technologies, nanotechnologies and biotechnologies). Under this regime, the characteristics of the investor are not relevant.
The following sectors are considered sensitive:
The Spanish government may extend this regime to other sectors if it considers that they may affect public security, public order or public health, but this extension has not done so yet.
For more information, see our publications below
The new National Security and Investment Act (NSI Act) entered into force on 4 January 2022.
The NSI Act establishes a new screening regime for investments in the UK, with a mandatory notification obligation for 17 of the most sensitive sectors and a voluntary regime for other areas of the economy (coupled with a broad power for UKG to “call in” transactions for review). The NSI Act has an incredibly broad jurisdictional scope and no de minimis turnover, monetary value or market share thresholds. The NSI Act has retroactive effect in that any transaction closing after 11 November 2020 could be “called in” for review by the Secretary of State.
The public interest grounds of intervention under the Enterprise Act 2002 relating to media plurality, public health and financial stability continues to apply but the national security ground for intervention has been repealed, now that the much more far-reaching NSI Act has come into effect.
For the mandatory regime, a “trigger event” arises where a person acquires more than 25%, 50% and 75% of votes or shares in an in-scope entity (or is able to secure or prevent the passage of any class of resolution governing the entity’s affairs).
The voluntary regime:
There are no turnover, transaction value or market share safe harbours under the NSI Act.
The regime captures international transactions where the target has activities in the UK and/or supplies goods or services in the UK. There is no need for a target to have a UK-incorporated subsidiary.
The NSI Act applies to both UK and overseas investors.
The mandatory regime under the NSI Act only applies to share acquisitions. Conversely, the voluntary regime (and call-in power) also captures asset acquisitions. Qualifying assets include a broad range of assets such as land, tangible moveable property and, with respect to IP, any idea, information, or technique with industrial, commercial or other economic value.
The 17 sensitive sectors subject to mandatory notification are as follows: advanced materials; advanced robotics; artificial intelligence; civil nuclear; communications; computing hardware; critical suppliers to government; critical suppliers to the emergency services; cryptographic authentication; data infrastructure; defence; energy; military and dual-use; quantum technologies; satellite and space technologies; synthetic biology and transport.
For more information, see our publications below
The US is one of the most mature foreign investment regimes and has a long track record of enforcement. Most reviews are conducted by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which reviews foreign investments in US businesses and real estate.
No specific Covid-19 restrictions have been included in the legislation or regulations governing CFIUS. CFIUS retains broad authority over acquisitions of control of Covid-19 related businesses but may have limited authority to mandate pre-closing filings involving these businesses or to assert jurisdiction over noncontrolling investments. CFIUS can initiate its own reviews of transactions over which it has jurisdiction if the parties do not submit voluntary filings.
CFIUS principally reviews foreign acquisitions of control of US businesses, including US operations of non-US companies. CFIUS also reviews non-controlling investments, coupled with governance/information access rights, in US businesses engaged in critical technology, critical infrastructure, or sensitive personal data of US citizens (TID Businesses). Pre-closing CFIUS filings are mandatory for 25% voting interests in TID Businesses if a foreign government holds a 49% voting interest in the investor. CFIUS filings are also required for critical technology investments of any size if (i) the foreign investor receives control or certain governance/information access rights; and (ii) certain industries identified as sensitive are involved. The industry test is expected to be replaced with one based on the need for export licenses to share the target’s technology with the foreign investor or certain affiliates.
Control is defined imprecisely by CFIUS as the power, direct or indirect, whether or not exercised, to use majority ownership, a dominant minority interest, board representation, contractual rights, or other arrangements to determine, direct, or decide important matters affecting a US business. A limited number of minority shareholder protections are excepted from the definition of control rights. CFIUS interprets the definition broadly and has found control when an investor has sought a less than 20% voting interest coupled with only one board representative.
Sensitive sectors include: Critical technologies (certain export-controlled technologies), critical infrastructure (specific communications, energy, transport, and financial infrastructure, plus certain strategic materials and industrial resources), and sensitive personal data of US citizens (e.g., genetic data or other personally identifiable data including financial, health, security, or other qualitative factors).
For more information, see our publications below
At Linklaters, we have world-leading experience thanks to our dedicated and truly integrated global network. We are continually monitoring developments in this rapidly evolving area in order to remain ahead of the curve. We offer clients a one stop shop for handling merger control and foreign investment review filings: a single, central point of contact, as well as a consistently high level of quality.
FIND OUT MORE ABOUT OUR FOREIGN INVESTMENT OFFERING
Merger control is critical to the success of any M&A transaction. Linklaters’ truly global team works with clients to devise their global merger control strategy. We combine commercial, legal, economic and often political considerations to maximise the chance of a successful outcome. We offer clients a one stop shop for handling merger control and foreign investment review filings: a single, central point of contact, as well as a consistently high level of quality.
With our global footprint and on-the-ground experience in multiple jurisdictions our Antitrust & Foreign Investment team support clients through the broad spectrum of challenges that arise before, during and after an investigation into behavioural conduct issues.
Linklaters has extensive experience of advising on the application of the EU procurement Directives and the implementing regulations adopted in various Member States. We have been involved in many important projects for both private and public sector clients (including national governments), which have required a combination of detailed technical legal expertise, innovative thinking and commercial focus.
In this evolving legal environment, companies with no previous (and often no foreseen) exposure to State aid issues are increasingly affected by the rules. Companies increasingly view State aid law as a powerful tool to challenge the legality of fiscal regimes and other State measures which favour their competitors. Our clients gain a competitive advantage from our wealth of experience in handling complex State aid cases.
The FSR builds on elements of State aid, merger control, foreign investment, public procurement, and trade defence. Our global team is one of the world’s leading practices across the spectrum of these matters and we have the skills, experience and bandwidth required to prepare your business. We advise on the most complex and strategic matters and have an award-winning reputation for innovation and excellence.
The team has advised on price controls, market access and liberalisation for utilities companies, as well as on the regulatory issues arising in the context of mergers and acquisitions and financing/restructuring transactions.