You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Welcome to the Knowledge Portal. You can browse, search or filter our publications, seminars and webinars, multimedia and collections of curated content from across our global network. Create an account and set your email alert preferences to receive the content relevant to you and your business, at your chosen frequency.
Explore our latest insights to keep abreast of key legal developments.
Keep up to speed on legal themes and developments through our curated collections of key content.
How would you like your page printed?
After much anticipation, the UK’s National Security and Investment Act (NSIA) entered into force on 4 January 2022, heralding a far-reaching UK investment screening regime. Investors wait to see how the regime’s broad powers will ultimately be substantively exercised in terms of the breadth of application of national security but a material impact on contractual risk allocation, transaction completion timelines and disclosure of investors’ interests should be expected by financial investors.
The Biden Administration has made clear that a shift to more aggressive antitrust enforcement is under way in the United States. With private equity investment models firmly in the FTC’s crosshairs more intense scrutiny of transactions and their impact on competition can be expected.
With the EC flagging concerns about foreign subsidies that distort the EU market, 2022 is likely to bring dealmakers a new regulatory hurdle to consider when conducting European transactions. Investment funds with links to non-EU governments or those that receive other forms of beneficial treatment (e.g. tax exemptions) can soon expect heightened scrutiny and an un-level playing field in auctions as a result. Depending on whether your fund is state backed or state linked (or not) this could be a boon or a curse for private equity.
The European Commission’s repurposing of Article 22 EUMR to capture any deal with adverse competitive effects irrespective of EU turnover introduces a further layer of potential uncertainty for dealmakers. Investors will need to consider carefully the associated call-in risk and how best to address the potentially significant impact for candidate transactions.
Competition regulators have recently flagged concerns regarding the impact of highly leveraged acquisitions on the competitiveness of the acquired business (and hence competition more generally). While current legal tests provide some constraint against regulators pursuing such theories in a merger control context closer scrutiny may develop as the political landscape continues to shift.
With antitrust enforcement expected to make a strong come-back in 2022, the evolving EU practice on “no fault” liability for shareholders and subsidiaries will be important to keep in mind. Managing portfolio company compliance and conducting detailed due diligence are important tools to manage potential exposure.
Explore our Year to Come 2022 and Year in Review 2021 series across 20+ jurisdictions and a number of legal topics.
Linklaters user? Sign In
Information collected as part of the registration process will be used to set up and manage your account and record your contact preferences.
Further details about how we collect and use your personal data on the Knowledge Portal, including information on your rights, are set out in our Global Privacy Notice and Cookie Notice.
If you were registered to the previous version of our Knowledge Portal, you will need to re-register to access our content.